In a case that had commentators running out of cinematic metaphors faster than a pizza at a student party, Colorado's own real-life courtroom drama against former President Donald Trump drew to a close this Wednesday. Like a wild west saga, the courtroom was buzzing with anticipation. But instead of cowboys and outlaws, there were familiar figures from the GOP, anti-Trump plaintiffs, and the already famous 'bamboozled bewilderment' expression on the face of Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold. Seeking to ban Trump from the Colorado ballot using an argument as dusty as a forgotten mine shaft, the time-traveling group of Republican defectors and independent voters claimed that a Civil War-era constitutional amendment makes Trump ineligible to hold office again. The amendment in question, better known as the obscure third cousin of the Constitution, hasn’t been invoked since that unfortunate incident involving President Ulysses S. Grant and a wagon full of ale. Trump's legal team, which according to sources changes more often than Colorado's weather, earmarked this case as historic - the biggest showdown since Civil War. One lawyer going as far as to suggest it could be the most significant case since Marty McFly's hoverboard 'incident'. The Colorado Republican Party, probably seen whispering "This town ain't big enough for the two of us," every chance they had, defended their 2024 frontrunner with as much gusto as a notoriously sluggish sloth. In an electrifying atmosphere that would make Doc Brown himself proud, legal eagles presented closing arguments. The plaintiffs' lead counsel dramatically declared, "We have a man here who'd sooner spin a yarn than a roulette wheel! This is not Back to the Future, it's Back to the Constitution!" Meanwhile, Trump's legal team, apparently inspired by Shakespeare, countered with "Much ado about nothing - except voting rights.” Regardless of the outcome of this farcically theatrical attempt to block Trump from the 2024 elections, one thing is clear: Colorado's courtroom drama has been more engrossing than a cowboy standoff, spaghettified with time-traveling shenanigans. And now that the gavel has dropped on this case, the question on everyone's lips is - which dusty constitutional amendment will be pulled out next from the depths of the history textbooks?