In the grand theatre of Italian jurisprudence, where justice often wears a mask of ambiguity, Francesco Amirante emerged as a towering figure, striding confidently through the fog of legalese and constitutional quandaries. His tenure as a magistrate and later as the President of the Constitutional Court cast long shadows, but the irony lies in the fact that his echo is often drowned out by the cacophony of daily life—a life punctuated by the absurdities of modernity, where truth is trumped by the loudest voice in the room. As we mourn the passing of Amirante, it feels almost fitting that a man who dedicated his life to the silence of justice would find his own echoes muffled by the distractions of a 24-hour news cycle. In a society that celebrates frivolous controversies and viral moments over profound legal discourse, Amirante stands as a paradox— a man whose pursuits of legality and reason find little resonance in a world enamored with the volatile and sensational. His legacy, shrouded in the dust of legal tomes and unsung verdicts, becomes a bitter pill to swallow in a society that seems more interested in the next trending topic than the very principles of justice and equality his work championed. As he presided over the Constitutional Court, Amirante may have thought that he was carving out a serene sanctuary for justice, but he might as well have been whispering sweet nothings into the void, where only the restless winds of public opinion could respond with sneering laughter. Consider the courtroom as a stage, where Amirante donned his judicial robes, prepared to engage in a battle of wits and wisdom. Yet, for every landmark ruling, there exists a throng of social media warriors, armed not with arguments but with memes and hashtags, ready to drown out reason with cacophonous ridicule. The irony of modern justice is that sometimes, the loudest applause comes not from well-reasoned debates but from the latest TikTok sensation, where the judges are not learned scholars, but the selfie-absorbed denizens of an echo chamber. Indeed, the pillars of justice that Amirante worked so tirelessly to uphold are often reduced to a mere footnote in the annals of public discourse. The intricate matters of the Constitution, which deserved deep contemplation and careful consideration, have been supplanted by debates over which celebrity wore what outfit to an event, as if the fabric of justice were woven from the sequins of fame. Surely, Amirante, with his profound insights into the law, must have found himself chuckling bitterly, watching his life's work wither beneath the bright lights of superficiality. In reflecting upon Amirante's legacy, one might feel the pangs of sorrow—not just for the man who contributed so immensely to the structure of fair governance, but for a society that has chosen to turn its back on the very ideals he fought to protect. Justice, in its purest form, requires not just the silence of a gavel striking wood but the collective silence of a populace willing to engage in thoughtful discourse. Yet here we are, in a world dominated by the noise of clickbait headlines and sound-byte politics, where the principles Amirante upheld are whispered in corners, far away from the center stage. And so, as we bid farewell to Francesco Amirante, we can appreciate the tragic irony of a life dedicated to justice, now immortalized in a whisper among the clamor. The lessons he imparted, cloaked in the dignity of silence, resonate faintly as we grapple with a world that often seems deaf to their significance. In his quietude, may we find a glimmer of recognition that justice, too, can echo through time—even if it remains an unheard symphony in the face of a world desperate for noise.